2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H vs. 2 x AMD EPYC 9654 Benchmarks

Add Processor To Compare:

* Note: Due to differences in Linux drivers/interfaces, the reported CPU clock may be displayed different depending upon the CPU - i.e. base vs. boost frequency.
* Disclosure: OpenBenchmarking.org may earn a commission/referral on affiliate shopping links should you decide to make any purchases from the third-party shopping links.

Of the components selected for comparison, there were 380 benchmarks in common (matching test profile, test version and any configurable test options) and where that data was statistically significant and at least three independent data points for each component of the public test results on OpenBenchmarking.org.

2 x AMD EPYC 9654 96-Core had the most wins, coming in first place for 82% of the tests.

Based on the geometric mean of all complete results, the fastest (2 x AMD EPYC 9654 96-Core) was 1.303x the speed of the slowest (2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H).

The results with the greatest spread from best to worst included: OpenVINO (Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU) at 4.863x, PostgreSQL (Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency) at 4.703x, PostgreSQL (Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only) at 4.698x, PostgreSQL (Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency) at 4.67x, PostgreSQL (Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only) at 4.619x, OpenVINO (Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16 - Device: CPU) at 4.231x, OpenVINO (Model: Face Detection Retail FP16 - Device: CPU) at 3.824x, OpenVINO (Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU) at 3.778x, libxsmm (M N K: 256) at 3.73x, oneDNN (Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU) at 3.427x.

380 Benchmarks Found In Common - Sort By: Greatest Spread